Just how good can PC audio be? Chris Lee investigates how to get the best audio quality from your computer, then pits the humble PC against one of the best CD players on the market.
It used to be taken for granted that in order to listen to your music you needed a hi-fi in your living room. Hi-fis and midi-centres haven't completely disappeared, but nowadays, millions of people store their music on a hard disk rather than in a CD rack.
Unfortunately, there are many reasons why using a PC to play music, as opposed to dedicated audio hardware, can be detrimental to your listening experience. Sound cards and PC speakers are often aimed at gamers rather than music lovers, and most popular media-playing applications prioritise convenience over pure sound quality. If you enjoy listening to music, the good news is that the PC is capable of producing much better quality audio than it's credited with by many hi-fi aficionados. As well as setting out to improve the sound of our MP3s, we also wanted to find out just how close the PC could come to high-end hi-fi equipment.
The Hi-Fi faith
High fidelity, or hi-fi, may be a slightly old-fashioned term, but it's a useful guide when it comes to improving sound quality, and remembering what it is that you're trying to achieve. After the original sound wave has been mastered and recorded to a medium, it's then the responsibility of a sound system to faithfully reproduce the information stored on that medium, be it a vinyl record or CD. The ultimate goal is that the final sound will have the same sense of space, rhythm and excitement as the original source, and a system that does this well is said to offer high fidelity, or be 'faithful to the source'.
The human ear is an incredibly sensitive organ that picks up a huge amount of data. Go to a live musical performance and you won't just hear a series of guitar chords, but also detect a wealth of tiny details, such as the different noise the guitarist's plectrum makes on the metal strings compared to their fingers, and how aggressively each individual string is struck. The sensitivity of modern recording equipment means that this kind of information is often committed to tape when the songs are recorded, and if it's present in the master, then ideally, you want to be able to hear these elements at home too.
Good-quality sound isn't just about tiny, incidental details though. When a drum kit is played at the back of the stage and a trumpet at the front, our brains not only tell us that the sounds are emanating from two different instruments, but can also discern that the drum kit is situated further away and slightly to the left of the trumpet. How we're able to process such complex calculations in real time - or why we enjoy listening to music so much in the first place - isn't a process that's fully understood. However, it's a process that's built on the purity of the sound and the power of detail.
For these reasons, we didn't just want to use the usual PC speakers to judge the subtle differences between the various digital audio compression formats, sound cards and media playing software, as even high-end PC speaker sets such as the Labs-winning Logitech Z-5500 Digital have a budget price tag and budget specifications when compared with what you can buy from specialist hi-fi firms. As a result, we carried out all the listening tests in this feature with a pair of £900 Bowers and Wilkins 683 floor-standing speakers. Of course, we needed an amplifier to power them, so we paired them with the highly rated £750 Cambridge Audio Azur 840A integrated amplifier.
PCs are use to CREATE Audio and at 32 bit 192khz can sound rather better than CD (16bit/44.1khz) if the same speakers/amp are used. The "quality" of the sound reproduction in this test depends more heavily on the speakers and amplification than the original source and this is because of how all Hi Fi gear is designed i.e to give a good sound regardless of program material. It should be pleasing to the listener, regardless of what they are listening to. The makers of the speakers "tuned" them to a certain frequency response pattern as did the makers of the amp. This gives the combination a particular tonal quality in it's reproduction from either source and this is why the listeners found it hard to differentiate between the 2 sources. Basically IMO, any improvement over basic PC audio gear will put a smile on your face ! Some soundcards are not very much better than decent on board audio and I'd spend "outside the box" first :)
i spent over £400 on my cambrige seperates not including speakers & £50 on a X-Fi the hi-fi sounds a lot better i would not swap it for a pc
Whilst PC sound quality may be acceptable, there's no way it'll be able to match decent hi-fi kit, after all the PC is put to many uses whereas hi-fi has only one purpose.... to upset the wife and bank balance.
I have followed a few of the tips in the arcticle and I can say I am very pleased with the results. I have had a Audigy 2 card in my PC for many years and am now using it to its potential. I'm looking to upgrade my sound card and knowing which card produced the best signal-to-noise ratio is the next thing I'd like to know.
.... mainly because of the amount of additional electrical noise in the case. Perhaps a decent fibre optic output hooked up to a nice external DAC? :-)
It would certainly help boost the cost of it all.
Not believable that the PC can compete with the 840Cm especially not with the inferior DAC's on the X-Fi soundcard. The test should be re-run using both M-Audio or ESI sound hardware which will give the PC better balance of sound but can't see it matching the 840C on detail.
Sorry, Custom PC comments are now closed.
Fastest, cheapest 3G mobile broadband dongles from 3, Vodafone, T-Mobile and Orange
from just £10/month