Graphics cards
Contained here is the answer to the ultimate question: how many stream processors does it take to render a lightbulb?
ATI Radeon X800GTO2

| Manufacturer: | Price: |
| £0 |
| Reviewer: | Review Date: |
| James Gorbold and Chris Lee | Jul 2007 |
|
|
|
|
Verdict: A two-year-old GPU that's better than many of ATi's more recent efforts.
The X800-series is an evolution of the Radeon 9800 Pro, which was
developed from the even more ancient Radeon 9700 Pro - the first
DirectX 9 card and, historically, one of ATi's best products. However,
due to its considerable age, the Radeon 9700 Pro and, consequently, the
X800-series don't support Direct 9c, Shader Model 3.
The mid-range models of the X800-series proved popular with punters a
year or two ago, as they were able to take on the competing GeForce
6-series in non-Shader Model 3 games. As such, it's likely that many
people will still own X800-series cards, and want to know how they
stack up in today's games against more modern GPUs.
The X800GTO2 was the only X800-series card we could lay our hands on,
and was one of the last models to be produced. It has distinctly
mid-range specifications, with just 12 pixel processors, 12 texture
processors and 12 ROPs. However, as the X800GTO2 was originally based
on the R430 or R480 core (depending on when it was made), a simple BIOS
upgrade could unlock a further four processing units, bringing the
total to 16 pixel processors, 16 texture processors and 16 ROPs - the
same number as that of the flagship X800 card, the X800XT PE. Once
unlocked, the X800GTO2 could take on cards that were significantly more
expensive, although whether it can still do this two years later
remains to be seen.
Despite its age and lack of Shader Model 3 support, the X800GTO2 was
able to play several of our test games without having to tone down the
quality settings. For example, it played Need for Speed: Carbon
smoothly at 1,280 x 1,024 with 2x AA and AF enabled - highly impressive
for a two-year-old card - while F.E.A.R. was smooth at 1,024 x 768.
However, forget about playing S.T.A.L.K.E.R. at maximum detail; at
1,024 x 768 the X800GTO2 jerked along at a miserable 11fps.
It's great to see that a two-year-old graphics card is able to play two
of our three test games, but it's clear from the S.T.A.L.K.E.R. results
that the X800GTO2 is at the end of its useful life. Just make sure that
you upgrade to a card that offers more performance, as many newer GPUs
with supposedly better features, such as the X1300-series and
X1600-series, are much slower than the X800GTO2.