Two processors and four graphics cards - what more could you want, apart from a new PSU?
Intel unveiled a 'Skull Trail' board at the Intel Developer Forum (IDF) today, which not only had two processor sockets, but also had four PCI-E graphics slots.
Steve Smith, Intel's vice president and director of digital enterprise operations, showed off the board as a part of his presentation on Intel's new 45nm processors. Smith said that the board already runs with 'dual configuration SLI,' and also said that we can 'expect support for up to four [graphics cards in SLI, we assume] in the future.'
Although this dual-processor board is clearly aimed at the workstation market, it will also appeal to enthusiasts who could potentially fill it with two quad-core processors and perhaps four graphics cards. This statement also reveals that Nvidia could potentially be reviving Quad SLI, as well as providing support for SLI on non-Nvidia chipsets,
Smith said that he expected the board to launch by the end of this year or the beginning of next year.
Maybe these are just doing this so they can get our money? Marketing strategies ? Ok wheres my intel and nvidia application form for chief executive :D Btw, i think its getting a bit old having to fork out for these all the time, whatever happened to the intergrated GPU/CPU we heard of awhile back.....? Now that would be better ! One block instead of 20 with numerous cables, a power station and turbine outside your house, and your next door neighbour who has a better computer than you also has a small nuke power station just to top off the jealousy :D
Looks like we're going to need FOUR £500 graphics cards and TWO £800 processors to get a playable frame rate in a DX10 game then. What happened to having ONE graphics card and ONE cpu that whe nyou upgraded to lasted more than 10 minutes....
@james_x_1: in short: signal interference. Cutting down on card slots results in shorter lines for the communication bus so the normal ways of signal shielding will still give you the full performance from the connected cards.
@james_x_1: in short: signal interference. Cutting down on card slots results in shorter lines for the communication bus so the normal ways of signal shielding will still give you the full performance from the connected cards.
So, where do I put my: High-end sound card Gigabit-speed network card Drive-controller card (full-tower case with 12 drive-slots) Temperature-monitor card Why do motherboard makers keep reducing the number of card-slots? Surely, with all the hardware, software, and firmware tech' out there, they can give us more slots? If they keep going down this road, there wont be any slots left for our high-end kit. That will spell the end for the PC Games Industry, unless someone finds a new way to interface, maybe use Firewire, or USB 3 ??
So, where do I put my: High-end sound card Gigabit-speed network card Drive-controller card (full-tower case with 12 drive-slots) Temperature-monitor card Why do motherboard makers keep reducing the number of card-slots? Surely, with all the hardware, software, and firmware tech' out there, they can give us more slots? If they keep going down this road, there wont be any slots left for our high-end kit. That will spell the end for the PC Games Industry, unless someone finds a new way to interface, maybe use Firewire, or USB 3 ??
Did notice that, watercooling could be a solution.
Anyone noticed that the final 2 gfx cards would have to be single slot... Lots of heat in not very much space makes for some big noisy fans
yeah 4 cards n 2 cpu's are gona need some monster psu's.
What more could I want? My own personal power station by the sounds of it.
Sorry, Custom PC comments are now closed.
Fastest, cheapest 3G mobile broadband dongles from 3, Vodafone, T-Mobile and Orange
from just £10/month