Sandra 2009 sorts the single-precision wimps from the double precision
The latest 2009 build of SiSoftware's familiar Sandra benchmark has been released with added GPGPU goodness, bringing it into competition with 3DMark Vantage, which tests a graphics cards ability to run gaming physics. From SiSoft's point of view, the new tests are a timely addition to the suite given that the general purpose compute potential of graphics chips has become such a hot topic over the past year or so. Along with Sandra's usual suite of CPU, storage, memory and platform tests, the 2009 version adds two GPGPU-specific benchmarks. Both NVIDIA's CUDA platform and AMD's Stream Processing are supported as well as up to eight GPUs running in parallel.
If that sounds
like digital double speak, the key aspect of the test is that is allows CPU and
GPU performance to be directly compared. One of the other intriguing features
is support for both single (32-bit) and double (64-bit) floating-point
precision. On existing graphics hardware, running double precision operations
on GPUs has tended to incur a major performance hit. That hasn't been much of a
problem to date given that games rarely make use of double precision. It's much
more important for general purpose computing, however. Over time, we expect
double-precision performance to be a key indicator of whether a GPU maker is
really delivering graphics chip architected with GPGPU in mind, or just paying
lip service to a fashionable subject.
Sandra's second test
is a little more straight forward. The GPGPU bandwidth benchmark measures the
memory bandwidth available to your GPU. It's derived from the stream memory
benchmarks as used by Sandra's CPU memory tests.
In its typically
efficient fashion, SiSoftware has crammed the entire benchmark suite into a
compact 18MB download. It may be early days for GPGPU processing on the PC and
as yet it's unclear whether this new synthetic test will provide worthwhile
insight. But with Intel tooling up to release its own GPU-like co-processor,
the Larrabee chip, late next year, and NVIDIA increasingly positioning its GPUs
as the future of high performance general computing, anything that helps us get
a handle on comparative GPGPU grunt is welcome.
ist me or are there no nvidia cards but a 9600gt to compare against in gpgpu tests???
isnt exactly what i call cheap :/ The money you could have used toward that next biggest graphics card, a 500/750GB hard drive, or that extra 2GB of DDR2 ram for that £50 .
I remember having SiS benchmarks on my computer, was good fun but I didn't have a very special machine back then. Trouble is SiS target businesses more, and charge an arm and a leg for a license for a home user. Still, I'm happy to see it's actually cheaper for Brits (£50) than Yanks ($100)!!
Make a Comment
Fastest, cheapest 3G mobile broadband dongles from 3, Vodafone, T-Mobile and Orange
from just £10/month